Leicester: Swim City
Excerpts from Chapter 6, excluding footnotes.
Close to Nature
The 16thcentury saw a moderation in Church teachings and although the records of history remain silent on the use of the river until 1741, a map of Leicester labels a field in this region as: 'The Bath', showing the return of swimming interest. Daniel Lambert (1770-1809) a well-known personality in the town, taught boys to swim here in the river Soar. Lambert was an excellent swimmer and such a celebrity in the town that all of Leicester's youngsters would look to him for instruction. Due to his tremendous size (he weighed over 52 stone when he died and measured 9 4 foot inches around his waist), he could float with ease; in fact it is said that he could swim with two men lying on his back. If some of his charges seemed a little timid, he would carry them across to the bank opposite their pile of clothes and leave them to struggle back. They would then either have to sink or swim!

Daniel Lambert
The city's bathing area, originally flanking Bath Lane, seems to have split both north and south with the growth of the town. Most popular was the area adjacent to Leicester's Abbey, known as Abbey Meadows. The area lies in the proximity of the old Abbey sewer, and the spot finds mention in the Dare Reports on working class life in Victorian Leicester. Joseph Dare was a middle class evangelist who did much to assist Leicester's workers to improve their situation and living conditions. Naked outdoor swimming in Abbey Meadows was, though, something of which he vehemently disapproved. He condemned the noisy enthusiasm of those bathing in the Soar and complained: 'Certain classes of roughs can only enjoy themselves by annoying decent people. The bathing in the pasture also deprives respectable females of the pleasant recreation of boating.'
Despite the area's reputation as a 'dank, diphtherial and febrile spot', it can't have been that unattractive if respectable ladies would consider it a suitable leisure area. Whatwasoffensive, in the mind of the middle classes at least, was the fact that bathers were splashing around in the nude. Dare continues:'I have seen fellows splashing about up to the North Bridge in full view of the public road and contiguous factories; and other like disgusting exhibitions at the top of Soar Lane coal wharf.'It was reasoned that men and boys bathing together in a naked state could be up to no good. Joseph Dare refers to disgusting scenes tolerated in the pasture, whilst others describe the area as'nothing else but a meeting place for all kinds of vice and filth.'Something had to be done, so Joseph Wright, the Inspector of Public Nuisances, was sent to investigate. Significantly he reported that there was nothing to complain of, but some could not accept this, concluding that the presence of the Inspector had caused the bathers to moderate their behaviour.It would be improper to suggest that all those attending were of impeccable morals. There may well have been indiscretions, even if not during the Inspector's visit, yet the real problem would appear to be the suspicion and fear that arose out of a clash of culture. The lack of privacy endured by the working class shaped their attitudes; they were without shame. Living in oppressive and cramped conditions with little opportunity for recreation, boys went wild on the riverside; they noisily enjoyed themselves and loved to run and swim naked (they ran to get dry). The middle classes benefited greatly from the labour of these lesser mortals, but their behaviour did not sit well with middle class niceties. The middle class liked everything to be regulated and well superintended, and this was most certainly not the case by the river.The success of Leicester's Thomas Cook in providing affordable holiday travel (by train since 1841) had not only contributed to the transformation of the seaside, it had given impetus to the polarization of attitudes regarding public decency on the beach. Back in 1847, Queen Victoria set a new trend by visiting the seaside 'just for fun' as opposed to sea bathing purely for medicinal purposes. Ten years later the Marquess of Westmeath presented a 'Bathing Bill' in the House of Lords requiring men to wear bathing costumes. However, the House thought the subject better dealt with through bye-laws and the Marquis withdrew his Bill. Nude sea bathing came under restriction and inevitably the days for bare bathers at home were now to be numbered. Victorian standards of morality and feelings of British supremacy led to a confidence and determination when it came to dealing with inferiors. After all, Britain ruled one in four of the world's population and clothed the world in wool and cotton. The middle classes had no doubt at all that 'God was an Englishman' and that he favoured the British. They felt that they knew better than the workers and they saw it as their God-given duty to civilise and moderate the potentially dangerous activities of such 'roughs', thereby retaining God's good pleasure. Pressure to conform had its roots in these early expressions of condemnation and it is still very apparent in the area even today, as evidenced by the proliferation of swimming restrictions in the city. More...
Leicester Shines
Imagine
The Swimming Hole
Swimming Days Out
Danger: Do Not Bathe
A Long Time Coming
Extremes
We Don't Want Water…
Environment City
Leicestershire Historian No 46 (2010) "This book examines the social history of swimming, demonstrating the important role it has played in everyday British Culture. ...religious and moral attitudes regarding swimming, seaside swimming and swimwear, and the rise and fall of sunbathing. Chapter 6 uses Leicester as a case study to explain how 'the British' swimmer came to be 'hung out to dry'. ...most convincingly researched... there is a lot of fascinating and detailed material in this book" Lucy Faire
"...a fascinating book by local author Chris Ayriss. ...very readable, informative and entertaining... many excellent illustrations." Leicester Mercury
Contents
